On White Guilt and Social Justice : Put Human Rights First

RogerWhite guilt is understandable: but it should not stop us seeking Human Rights for all

European colonisation killed over a hundred million people. Industrialization allowed pillaging on a scale never before imagined. The Slave Trade, The Sykes-Picot Agreement, the partition of India and Pakistan, and the tortured histories of colonised countries impact to this day the lives of countless millions of people.

Today, the US has the highest per-capita prison population in the world, disproportionately black. People of colour face discrimination and harassment that most white people will never comprehend. Westerners live in prosperity while wars and terror and drone strikes tear through Africa and the Middle East.

© Chris Manno. Used with permission

Frustratingly, many don’t seem to understand the depths of the colonial legacy. Or if they say they do, they don’t take it seriously enough. Crazy, I know.

You know what else I think is crazy? Forgetting that in the West we have it pretty damn good. Mostly. We may be governed by lizard monsters funnelling wealth to the top 1% of the top 1% — but we have the means to take it back, if we can only get our acts together.

This is not helped by a section of social justice advocates arguing over ridiculous things.

Some are upset about Justin Bieber having dreadlocks — despite many black people, surely, not giving a flying toss about it.

Here is where I am going to be controversial.

If social justice activists insist that white people can’t choose whether or not to have dreadlocks, without that by itself being racist, then they’re going to look intolerant and petty.

If social justice activists claim that giving up “free speech” wouldn’t be so bad, but can’t link that to the regular hacking to death of secular bloggers in Bangladesh by Islamists and the murder of “blaspehmers” in Pakistan and even Glasgow, then they are going to look like apologists for religious oppression and murder.

If social justice activists campaign for the rights of Muslim women to wear the Hijab and the Niqab voluntarily, but can’t condemn women being forced to cover up by law in Islamic countries, then they are going to look as if they only care about feminism if it’s for women in the West.

If social justice activists pretend women have it worst in the West, while not being able to condemn the sexual mutilation of little girls because these little girls are not white, then they are going to look like they’ve lost sight of reason.

If social justice activists don’t realise that they have to actually engage with and persuade people who don’t agree with their politics and aims and objectives, and instead declare everyone else racists and transphobes and islamophobes, then they’re in danger of looking like a cult.

If social justice activists dismiss anyone who even asks questions about immigration as fascists, but can’t condemn political Islamism which calls for the death penalty for apostates and Sharia law, and if they allow those calling for secularism or a tolerant Islam to be labelled “traitors” in the war against the West, then they are going to look like collaborators with the most conservative, most regressive forms of religion.

And if social justice activists think the way to resolve arguments is to shout each other down, and enforce ever more stringent and exclusive rules of behaviour, and ban each other for disagreeing, and be unable to have a civil conversation outside of safe spaces, then they’re in danger of becoming an irrelevant circular firing squad.

As ‘recovering academic’ Rani Neutill asks in her must-read piece on trigger warnings:

Do students of a radical nature think that if they are seeing eye to eye with the most extreme conservative element of the population that they are doing something right? Fighting for something positive? Participating in something different?

The rights we have in the West for women, LGBTQ people and other minorities have been fought for long and hard. Let’s work to extend them to everyone.

But what do I know? Tell me what you think.

By , Media lawyer turned startup founder.

THE PASHTUN TIMES

One comment

  1. Dr khurshid Alam

    Roger Dubar, a media lawyer, writes on the most basic issues faced by the world or better say humanity. Unfortunately, intellectuals always aim at the 1% 0f the top 1% of in intellectual of the society. He must be aware of the poverty of the doctors in English literature.
    The relatively higher percentage of social justice in the established white democracies and again the higher standards of transparent governance was not over night but as he puts it was the hard long struggle. It is the system which, produce the people, believing incorrectness. This system is basically the legacy of colonialism. The colonialism impact is very deep. The people starts thinking as if they are living in the vacuum. It kills the process of thinking and social, economical and political correctness. Britain is considered the craddle of democracy but can you really tell us the character and attitudinal difference between Churchill and Hitler. Both had contemptuous attitude and feeling of grandeur. It is the victory and defeat made the one a hero and the other a villain. The extrinsic factors do have an impact on the distortion of actual correctness. Compare Nehru and Gandhi; It is a strange paradox of history to make one Mahatma and the other just a P.M of a country. Was Nehru by any standard of intellectualism lesser humanist than the other. Colonialist destroys the social fabric and human evolutionary wisdom.
    You will find so many to follow you or become co-sailors but it will be a lot better that if you write-ups are for common man. The difference to me in the two leaders mentioned above was, one talking in the language of the commons and the other for the top 1%. In my area, Abdul Ghaffar khan, known as frontier Gandhi or the Pride of Afghans had the same quality to share his wisdom with 99 % instead of focussing at one percent. This one percentage is applicable in every respect to human values.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*