‘More than one national language will not threaten security’

PashtoISLAMABAD: Decision makers should know that having more than one national language will not pose a threat to national security, and history shows that one language does not ensure a country will remain intact, said Punjabi writer Mushtaq Sufi.

“A narrative is being constructed for the last 70 years that there should be one national language because that is the only way the country can remain strong,” Mr Sufi said while speaking at a two-day symposium held at the Pakistan Academy of Letters (PAL) on Monday.

“Urdu was imposed as the only national language in the country, a move which invited resistance in East Pakistan from the very beginning. So that narrative is not correct historically,” he said.

Mushtaq Sufi said many countries have various official languages including Canada, Iran, Russia, Belgium, India and Afghanistan among others and that the plurality of their national languages has not posed a threat to their national security.

On the other hand, only one of 22 languages are spoken in the Arab world, where a single language has not guaranteed security, he argued.

Writers, literati gather to draft policy for government regarding the status of languages in Pakistan


“Pakistan is situated in an area where multiple languages have been spoken for centuries and scholars say this diversity is an asset. I am a Punjabi and I am not afraid of the other languages in the country. I believe that there is no alternate for any language because languages are more of a way to see the world that they are a way to communicate,” he said.

“It is unfortunate that the languages of those who helped build the country, including the Bengalis, Baloch, Sindhi and Pakhtoon, are considered a threat to the country,” he added.

Baloch writer Panah Baloch said terrorism can only be eradicated by promoting local languages which impart the message of the sufis.

“The local language is taught in Sindh which is why we can hardly find a Sindhi terrorist. Iran included Balochi in the curriculum due to which many issues have been addressed,” he said.

Pakhtun writer Noorul Amin Yousafzai said people should have the right to receive education in any language. He said five languages have been included in the curriculum in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and that the curriculum board is working on the matter.

Educationist Prof Dr Javed Iqbal pointed out that the Khushal Khan Khattak University in KP does not have a Pashto department.

Two participants said Urdu is spoken across the country and should not be referred to as a foreign language.

“Urdu is the language of Punjab and was spoken here before Pakistan came into being. There are many dialects in Punjabi which means Punjabi cannot replace Urdu, not even in Punjab,” said a participant, Arshad Mehmood.

Writer Tariq Rehman said the ruling elite thinks adopting more languages will not be in their interests.

“These kinds of decisions are not feasible for multilingual states and that is why the problem in Bengal started,” he said.

PAL Chairman Dr Qasim Bugio said that the PPP had made many efforts for drafting a language policy and that the PML-N had included addressing the issue on its mandate. Efforts were also made in the National Assembly and the Senate to declare more languages as national languages, which could so far not be done.

“PAL therefore decided to invite literary figures to discuss the issue during a two day symposium, which is being held in connection with mother languages day, and prepare a draft policy for the government. We hope that political parties will consider the draft because it will be prepared by the academia,” he said.

On Feb 21, 1952, students of the Dhaka University had held a protest, demanding that Bangla be declared a national language of Pakistan because 56pc of the country’s population spoke the language.

The police opened fire at them during which five students were killed. Unesco declared the day the students were killed the International Day of Mother Languages, which is now observed worldwide. -DN


One comment

  1. Reza Khan Yousufzai

    How the language of a small minority of 3 % at the “independence ” of Pakistan in 1947 could be declared official and national at the expense of the indigenous Pashto,Sindhi, Baluchi,Seraiki, Potohari and Landhi baffles the mind.The Bengalis who were 56 % of the population has their identity and language subsumed to please a Urdu racist elite.
    These racist Urdu elite from the united provinces of nother India and Punjab always viewed themselves as a cut above the rest and has used islam and their pseudo Islam to promote their own langauge and material interest and maintaining the status quo. They gave urdu a sort of religious flavour and some even went so far as declaring it more islamic than Arabic itself.
    Now the time has come for declaring Pashtio ,Sindhi, Baluchi,Searaiki and Potohari and Ladni as national official languages and not the derogatory regional term that is arrbitrarily assigned to it. Even if a language is only spoken in one region by a significant number of people it should be a national language. To call Pashto regional is an insult to Pashtun and similarly Baluchi.
    In South Africa there are 11 official languages ,some are spoken only in one or two or three of the nine provinces of that country,yet they are designated as national and official as they represent a significant groupd and is indigenous . Zulu are mainly spoken in 3 provinces KwaZulu-Natal province,Gauteng and Mpumalanga province yet,it has national official statussimilarly Xhosa is only spoken in two provinces Eastern cape and as a Western Cape provinces ,yet it has national status.similarly Pashto should be national official.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *